Сканируем цепочку и источники… / Scanning chain and providers…
0xb596eC0C524375Cf8eD196571b0Fef8B10fe1e18Elevated risk
There are notable risks. Go through the warnings below before deciding anything.
This is not advice to buy or sell and not a price forecast. Nobody can honestly predict memecoin prices: we only show verifiable risks and facts. Only put in what you can afford to lose.
Some sources failed — showing the last good data with timestamps.
The ten largest wallets (pools and burn excluded) hold 100.0% of circulating supply. Their selling can crash the price.
What does this mean? →A $1,000 sell would move the price by about 10.6% (approximate).
What does this mean? →The contract executes external code in its own context. Outside a standard proxy this can change state unpredictably.
rpc v4 Swap logs
Not enough history yet — points accumulate every 15 s while the token is watched.
quvr snapshots (dexscreener)
No deployer token activity found.
rpc Transfer logs
| Verified source | No data |
| No dangerous privileges | 24 / 30 |
| Ownership/admin safety | 20 / 20 |
| Sell simulation | 20 / 20 |
| Proxy/upgrade risk | 10 / 10 |
| No transfer restrictions | 10 / 10 |
| Liquidity / market cap | 30 / 30 |
| Depth & price impact | 10 / 30 |
| Age & stability | 5 / 15 |
| Distribution across pools | 6 / 10 |
| Liquidity trend | No data |
| Top holder concentration | 0 / 35 |
| Deployer share | 20 / 20 |
| Related clusters | 20 / 20 |
| Holder growth | No data |
| No suspicious mass transfers | 15 / 15 |
Momentum ≠ safety
| New thesis velocity | 0 / 20 |
| Unique authors | 0 / 15 |
| Author quality | No data |
| Confirmed by buys | No data |
| Authors still holding | No data |
| Signal freshness | 0 / 10 |
The pool is under 6 hours old: little trading history, higher risk.
What does this mean? →The main Uniswap v4 pool is attached to a hooks contract that may charge its own fees or alter swap logic. Price impact estimates do not account for it.
The Blockscout API is unavailable without a key (bot protection on the public API). Analysis is based on bytecode and read-only calls.
| $100 | ≈ −1.35% |
| $1,000 | ≈ −10.59% |
| $5,000 | ≈ −36.88% |
Approximate: active liquidity at the current tick; tick crossings and hook fees are not modeled.
Transfers along the buy and sell path are not blocked
eth_call ERC20.transfer at block 71710818 (holder → pool, pool → new wallet) · sell: transfer to pool 0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951: ok · buy: transfer from pool to new wallet: ok
Read-only simulation (eth_call) on the current block; nothing is sent to the network. Router, Permit2 and hook logic is not executed.
| # | Address | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0x990B…21Cc | 34.01% | related? |
| 2 | 0xD549…4C3c | 32.97% | related? |
| 3 | 0x510e…CF91 | 32.94% | related? |
| 4 | 0x6f02…0F77 | 0.09% | contract |
Share of circulating supply excluding the addresses below
Heuristic based on shared signals. Does not prove the wallets belong to one person.