0x7E96C5D2dd964BcCf631dd6ABD0750dA4Cf52dAa兑换:Uniswap ↗外部网站 · QUVR 不执行交易,也不收取费用
Fomo Copilot ↗风险偏高
存在明显风险。做任何决定前,请先查看下方警告。
这不是买卖建议,也不是价格预测。没有人能诚实地预测 Memecoin 的价格:我们只展示可核实的风险和事实。只投入你输得起的钱。
部分数据源未响应——显示带时间戳的最近有效数据。
Even small trades move the price noticeably; exiting a position may be hard.
这是什么意思? →A $1,000 sell would move the price by about 23.8% (approximate).
这是什么意思? →Transfer history was not fully loaded; holder metrics are approximate.
rpc v4 Swap logs
历史数据不足——关注期间每 15 秒记录一个数据点。
quvr snapshots (dexscreener)
1 条观点
Fomo 交易者的观点及发帖后的价格表现。仅为观点,并非风险评级。
Simple explanation from the dev himself: Fomo traders are practically locked into their positions rn especially if you’re a top holder in a popular token. One sell and everybody sees it and that causes a cascade of sells. The credit layer would be receipt tokens where they’d put their position into a vault, get minted a 1:1 receipt token that mirrors the real positions value (and still shows up in their wallet and on FOMO/pump) and could use their position as collateral for liquidity without having to sell it. For Stonk tokens, people inherently are holding them for the reflections. ZCAT holders want the reflections so they don’t sell their ZCAT. But that locks up their liquidity. Reflections are basically troglodyte reflections but we can’t split it similar to how we can split tokenized stocks. We can’t however route reflections from the vault (that’s holding the collateral, ZCAT for example) back to the originator address so they can open up liquidity by using their position as coll…
未发现部署者对该代币的操作。
rpc Transfer logs
| Verified source | 暂无数据 |
| No dangerous privileges | 30 / 30 |
| Ownership/admin safety | 20 / 20 |
| Sell simulation | 20 / 20 |
| Proxy/upgrade risk | 10 / 10 |
| No transfer restrictions | 10 / 10 |
| Liquidity / market cap | 30 / 30 |
| Depth & price impact | 4 / 30 |
| Age & stability | 15 / 15 |
| Distribution across pools | 6 / 10 |
| Liquidity trend | 暂无数据 |
| Top holder concentration | 35 / 35 |
| Deployer share | 暂无数据 |
| Related clusters | 20 / 20 |
| Holder growth | 2 / 10 |
| No suspicious mass transfers | 15 / 15 |
热度 ≠ 低风险
| New thesis velocity | 0 / 20 |
| Unique authors | 3 / 15 |
| Author quality | 4 / 25 |
| Confirmed by buys | 20 / 20 |
| Authors still holding | 暂无数据 |
| Signal freshness | 1 / 10 |
The Blockscout API is unavailable without a key (bot protection on the public API). Analysis is based on bytecode and read-only calls.
| $100 | ≈ −3.04% |
| $1,000 | ≈ −23.85% |
| $5,000 | ≈ −61.02% |
近似值:按当前 tick 的活跃流动性计算;未计入跨 tick 和 hook 手续费。
函数分发器中未发现。
买入和卖出路径上的转账未被阻止
eth_call ERC20.transfer at block 87864625 (holder → pool, pool → new wallet) · sell: transfer to pool 0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951: ok · buy: transfer from pool to new wallet: ok
Read-only simulation (eth_call) on the current block; nothing is sent to the network. Router, Permit2 and hook logic is not executed.
| # | 地址 | 占比 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0x0000…031c | 0.3% | 关联?合约 |
| 2 | 0x8d15…c6f4 | 0.12% | 新钱包 |
| 3 | 0xE5e7…e044 | 0.05% | 关联?合约 |
占流通量比例(不含下方排除的地址)
基于共同特征的启发式判断,不能证明这些钱包属于同一人。