Сканируем цепочку и источники… / Scanning chain and providers…
0x7E96C5D2dd964BcCf631dd6ABD0750dA4Cf52dAaIntercambiar en:Uniswap ↗sitio externo · QUVR no ejecuta operaciones ni cobra comisiones
Fomo Copilot ↗Riesgo elevado
Hay riesgos notables. Revisa las alertas de abajo antes de decidir nada.
No es una recomendación de compra o venta ni una previsión de precio. Nadie puede predecir honestamente el precio de una memecoin: solo mostramos riesgos y hechos verificables. Invierte solo lo que puedas permitirte perder.
Algunas fuentes no respondieron: se muestran los últimos datos correctos con su hora.
Even small trades move the price noticeably; exiting a position may be hard.
¿Qué significa? →A $1,000 sell would move the price by about 23.8% (approximate).
¿Qué significa? →Transfer history was not fully loaded; holder metrics are approximate.
rpc v4 Swap logs
Aún no hay suficiente historial: se añaden puntos cada 15 s mientras se sigue el token.
quvr snapshots (dexscreener)
1 tesis
Lo que publican los traders de Fomo y qué hizo el precio después. Opiniones, no una calificación de riesgo.
Simple explanation from the dev himself: Fomo traders are practically locked into their positions rn especially if you’re a top holder in a popular token. One sell and everybody sees it and that causes a cascade of sells. The credit layer would be receipt tokens where they’d put their position into a vault, get minted a 1:1 receipt token that mirrors the real positions value (and still shows up in their wallet and on FOMO/pump) and could use their position as collateral for liquidity without having to sell it. For Stonk tokens, people inherently are holding them for the reflections. ZCAT holders want the reflections so they don’t sell their ZCAT. But that locks up their liquidity. Reflections are basically troglodyte reflections but we can’t split it similar to how we can split tokenized stocks. We can’t however route reflections from the vault (that’s holding the collateral, ZCAT for example) back to the originator address so they can open up liquidity by using their position as coll…
No se encontró actividad del deployer con el token.
rpc Transfer logs
| Verified source | Sin datos |
| No dangerous privileges | 30 / 30 |
| Ownership/admin safety | 20 / 20 |
| Sell simulation | 20 / 20 |
| Proxy/upgrade risk | 10 / 10 |
| No transfer restrictions | 10 / 10 |
| Liquidity / market cap | 30 / 30 |
| Depth & price impact | 4 / 30 |
| Age & stability | 15 / 15 |
| Distribution across pools | 6 / 10 |
| Liquidity trend | Sin datos |
| Top holder concentration | 35 / 35 |
| Deployer share | Sin datos |
| Related clusters | 20 / 20 |
| Holder growth | 2 / 10 |
| No suspicious mass transfers | 15 / 15 |
Impulso ≠ bajo riesgo
| New thesis velocity | 0 / 20 |
| Unique authors | 3 / 15 |
| Author quality | 4 / 25 |
| Confirmed by buys | 20 / 20 |
| Authors still holding | Sin datos |
| Signal freshness | 1 / 10 |
The Blockscout API is unavailable without a key (bot protection on the public API). Analysis is based on bytecode and read-only calls.
| $100 | ≈ −3,04% |
| $1,000 | ≈ −23,85% |
| $5,000 | ≈ −61,02% |
Aproximado: liquidez activa en el tick actual; no se modelan cruces de ticks ni comisiones de hooks.
No se encontraron en el despachador de funciones.
Las transferencias en la ruta de compra y venta no están bloqueadas
eth_call ERC20.transfer at block 87864625 (holder → pool, pool → new wallet) · sell: transfer to pool 0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951: ok · buy: transfer from pool to new wallet: ok
Read-only simulation (eth_call) on the current block; nothing is sent to the network. Router, Permit2 and hook logic is not executed.
| # | Dirección | Cuota | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0x0000…031c | 0,3% | ¿vinculada?contrato |
| 2 | 0x8d15…c6f4 | 0,12% | nueva |
| 3 | 0xE5e7…e044 | 0,05% | ¿vinculada?contrato |
Cuota del suministro circulante sin las direcciones excluidas abajo
Heurística basada en señales comunes. No demuestra que las wallets pertenezcan a una sola persona.
Sin datos
geckoterminal