Сканируем цепочку и источники… / Scanning chain and providers…
0x2E8c2611BBDcB641F1aE0F45ace8235B7A9D1e18Swap on:Uniswap ↗external site · QUVR does not execute trades or take fees
High risk
Serious red flags found. With signs like these it is very easy to lose the money you put in.
This is not advice to buy or sell and not a price forecast. Nobody can honestly predict memecoin prices: we only show verifiable risks and facts. Only put in what you can afford to lose.
The ten largest wallets (pools and burn excluded) hold 100.0% of circulating supply. Their selling can crash the price.
What does this mean? →The creator wallet holds 85.5% of supply.
What does this mean? →2 wallets sharing signals hold 85.5%. This is a heuristic and does not prove common ownership.
What does this mean? →rpc v4 Swap logs
| Verified source | No data |
| No dangerous privileges | 30 / 30 |
| Ownership/admin safety | 6 / 20 |
| Sell simulation | 20 / 20 |
| Proxy/upgrade risk | 10 / 10 |
| No transfer restrictions | 10 / 10 |
| Liquidity / market cap | 26 / 30 |
| Depth & price impact | 30 / 30 |
| Age & stability | 6 / 15 |
| Distribution across pools | 6 / 10 |
| Liquidity trend | 15 / 15 |
| Top holder concentration | 0 / 35 |
| Deployer share | 0 / 20 |
| Related clusters | 0 / 20 |
| Holder growth | No data |
| No suspicious mass transfers | 15 / 15 |
Momentum ≠ safety
| New thesis velocity | 0 / 20 |
| Unique authors | 0 / 15 |
| Author quality | No data |
| Confirmed by buys | No data |
| Authors still holding | No data |
| Signal freshness | 0 / 10 |
Owner privileges are controlled by a single key without a timelock or multisig.
What does this mean? →The pool is under 6 hours old: little trading history, higher risk.
What does this mean? →The token was created by a factory as a minimal clone of template 0xa604bed22a88ae9814476997a619c6eb876f2cc7. The logic address is fixed in the clone's code and cannot be changed — this is not an upgradeable proxy. Powers were checked against the template's code.
The main Uniswap v4 pool is attached to a hooks contract that may charge its own fees or alter swap logic. Price impact estimates do not account for it.
The Blockscout API is unavailable without a key (bot protection on the public API). Analysis is based on bytecode and read-only calls.
quvr snapshots (dexscreener)
Approximate: active liquidity at the current tick; tick crossings and hook fees are not modeled.
None found in the function dispatcher.
Transfers along the buy and sell path are not blocked
eth_call ERC20.transfer at block 74981796 (holder → pool, pool → new wallet) · sell: transfer to pool 0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951: ok · buy: transfer from pool to new wallet: ok
Read-only simulation (eth_call) on the current block; nothing is sent to the network. Router, Permit2 and hook logic is not executed.
| # | Address | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0x3F5D…7DBE | 99.98% | deployerrelated? |
| 2 | 0xB4aD…c840 | 0.02% | related?contract |
| 3 | 0x62EC…4883 | 0% | |
| 4 | 0x8F10…f996 | 0% | contract |
Share of circulating supply excluding the addresses below
Heuristic based on shared signals. Does not prove the wallets belong to one person.
rpc Transfer logs
“High risk” was first recorded Sep 28, 04:20 PM UTC. This record cannot be changed afterwards.
No data
geckoterminal · uniswap · stale